Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP dues in 8 quarterly installments from June 2022 to March 2024. The Appellant claimed that payments made by the Corporate Debtor after CIRP commencement should be appropriated towards pre-CIRP dues instead of current CIRP costs. The NCLAT held that the resolution plan's schedule for payment of pre-CIRP dues was sacrosanct and cannot be superseded. Any payments made after CIRP commencement must be appropriated towards current CIRP dues, not pre-CIRP dues. The Appellant was entitled to payment of pre-CIRP dues only as per the approved resolution plan. The Adjudicating Authority's view that post-CIRP payments cannot be appropriated towards pre-CIRP dues was reasonable and upheld. The appeal was dismissed.
The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP dues in 8 quarterly installments from June 2022 to March 2024. The Appellant claimed that payments made by the Corporate Debtor after CIRP commencement should be appropriated towards pre-CIRP dues instead of current CIRP costs. The NCLAT held that the resolution plan's schedule for payment of pre-CIRP dues was sacrosanct and cannot be superseded. Any payments made after CIRP commencement must be appropriated towards current CIRP dues, not pre-CIRP dues. The Appellant was entitled to payment of pre-CIRP dues only as per the approved resolution plan. The Adjudicating Authority's view that post-CIRP payments cannot be appropriated towards pre-CIRP dues was reasonable and upheld. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
