Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Maintainability of application u/s 9 of IBC, 2016 for non-payment of dues arising from supply of manpower services hinges on existence of pre-existing dispute between parties. Emails prior to demand notice evidenced Corporate Debtor's concerns regarding adequacy of services, manpower shortages and security lapses, constituting pre-existing dispute. As per Mobilox case, if notice of dispute received by Operational Creditor or record of dispute exists, application must be rejected u/s 9(5)(2)(d). Corporate Debtor raised plausible contention of pre-existing dispute, not a feeble legal argument. Given bonafide dispute's existence, Adjudicating Authority correctly rejected Section 9 application. Appeal against impugned order dismissed.
Maintainability of application u/s 9 of IBC, 2016 for non-payment of dues arising from supply of manpower services hinges on existence of pre-existing dispute between parties. Emails prior to demand notice evidenced Corporate Debtor's concerns regarding adequacy of services, manpower shortages and security lapses, constituting pre-existing dispute. As per Mobilox case, if notice of dispute received by Operational Creditor or record of dispute exists, application must be rejected u/s 9(5)(2)(d). Corporate Debtor raised plausible contention of pre-existing dispute, not a feeble legal argument. Given bonafide dispute's existence, Adjudicating Authority correctly rejected Section 9 application. Appeal against impugned order dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.