<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Manpower supply dues can&#039;t trigger IBC if pre-existing dispute, bonafide objection over services existed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81531</link>
    <description>Maintainability of application u/s 9 of IBC, 2016 for non-payment of dues arising from supply of manpower services hinges on existence of pre-existing dispute between parties. Emails prior to demand notice evidenced Corporate Debtor&#039;s concerns regarding adequacy of services, manpower shortages and security lapses, constituting pre-existing dispute. As per Mobilox case, if notice of dispute received by Operational Creditor or record of dispute exists, application must be rejected u/s 9(5)(2)(d). Corporate Debtor raised plausible contention of pre-existing dispute, not a feeble legal argument. Given bonafide dispute&#039;s existence, Adjudicating Authority correctly rejected Section 9 application. Appeal against impugned order dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:32:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Manpower supply dues can&#039;t trigger IBC if pre-existing dispute, bonafide objection over services existed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81531</link>
      <description>Maintainability of application u/s 9 of IBC, 2016 for non-payment of dues arising from supply of manpower services hinges on existence of pre-existing dispute between parties. Emails prior to demand notice evidenced Corporate Debtor&#039;s concerns regarding adequacy of services, manpower shortages and security lapses, constituting pre-existing dispute. As per Mobilox case, if notice of dispute received by Operational Creditor or record of dispute exists, application must be rejected u/s 9(5)(2)(d). Corporate Debtor raised plausible contention of pre-existing dispute, not a feeble legal argument. Given bonafide dispute&#039;s existence, Adjudicating Authority correctly rejected Section 9 application. Appeal against impugned order dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:32:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>