Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Contravention of Sections 8(3), 8(4), and 9(1)(b) of FERA established - illegal foreign exchange remittance abroad disguised as charges for imports that never occurred. Sections apply to 'person', not limited to 'importer'. Evidence showed appellant controlled firms receiving remittances despite claims of missing import documents. Customs reports confirmed no diamonds imported against remittances. Appellant orchestrated modus operandi for illegal remittances. Composite penalty upheld for contraventions by appellant and co-appellant. Appeals dismissed.
Contravention of Sections 8(3), 8(4), and 9(1)(b) of FERA established - illegal foreign exchange remittance abroad disguised as charges for imports that never occurred. Sections apply to 'person', not limited to 'importer'. Evidence showed appellant controlled firms receiving remittances despite claims of missing import documents. Customs reports confirmed no diamonds imported against remittances. Appellant orchestrated modus operandi for illegal remittances. Composite penalty upheld for contraventions by appellant and co-appellant. Appeals dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
