Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a money laundering case involving proceeds of crime and non-compliance with subsidized coal regulations. The court analyzed the materials on record, including FIRs against the petitioner in 2010-2011 and the ECIRs (Enforcement Case Information Reports) filed by the authorities. The court considered the Supreme Court's judgment in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary, which clarified the definition of "proceeds of crime" under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Based on this judgment, the court found that the amount invested by the petitioner, described as "paid and purchase," could not prima facie be considered proceeds of crime. Consequently, the petitioner was directed to be released on regular bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of the same amount to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, PMLA, Ranchi, in connection with ECIR Case No. 01 of 2024.
The court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a money laundering case involving proceeds of crime and non-compliance with subsidized coal regulations. The court analyzed the materials on record, including FIRs against the petitioner in 2010-2011 and the ECIRs (Enforcement Case Information Reports) filed by the authorities. The court considered the Supreme Court's judgment in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary, which clarified the definition of "proceeds of crime" under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Based on this judgment, the court found that the amount invested by the petitioner, described as "paid and purchase," could not prima facie be considered proceeds of crime. Consequently, the petitioner was directed to be released on regular bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of the same amount to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, PMLA, Ranchi, in connection with ECIR Case No. 01 of 2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
