<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Petitioner Granted Bail in Money Laundering Case; Investments Not &quot;Proceeds of Crime&quot; Per Supreme Court Ruling.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81489</link>
    <description>The court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a money laundering case involving proceeds of crime and non-compliance with subsidized coal regulations. The court analyzed the materials on record, including FIRs against the petitioner in 2010-2011 and the ECIRs (Enforcement Case Information Reports) filed by the authorities. The court considered the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary, which clarified the definition of &quot;proceeds of crime&quot; under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Based on this judgment, the court found that the amount invested by the petitioner, described as &quot;paid and purchase,&quot; could not prima facie be considered proceeds of crime. Consequently, the petitioner was directed to be released on r.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:00:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:00:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Petitioner Granted Bail in Money Laundering Case; Investments Not &quot;Proceeds of Crime&quot; Per Supreme Court Ruling.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81489</link>
      <description>The court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a money laundering case involving proceeds of crime and non-compliance with subsidized coal regulations. The court analyzed the materials on record, including FIRs against the petitioner in 2010-2011 and the ECIRs (Enforcement Case Information Reports) filed by the authorities. The court considered the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary, which clarified the definition of &quot;proceeds of crime&quot; under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Based on this judgment, the court found that the amount invested by the petitioner, described as &quot;paid and purchase,&quot; could not prima facie be considered proceeds of crime. Consequently, the petitioner was directed to be released on r.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:00:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>