Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Insurance company computing income u/s 44 is not required to include profits from sale of investments for periods prior to 01.04.2011 as per Rule 5, aligning with decisions in United Insurance Company and Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Apollo Tyres Ltd. judgment on MAT computation is irrelevant as present case involves regular computation u/s 44 specific to insurance business. Profits from sale of investments must be included post 01.04.2011 due to amended Rule 5(b). High Court ruled in favor of assessee.
Insurance company computing income u/s 44 is not required to include profits from sale of investments for periods prior to 01.04.2011 as per Rule 5, aligning with decisions in United Insurance Company and Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Apollo Tyres Ltd. judgment on MAT computation is irrelevant as present case involves regular computation u/s 44 specific to insurance business. Profits from sale of investments must be included post 01.04.2011 due to amended Rule 5(b). High Court ruled in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.