Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Insurance company computing income u/s 44 is not required to include profits from sale of investments for periods prior to 01.04.2011 as per Rule 5, aligning with decisions in United Insurance Company and Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Apollo Tyres Ltd. judgment on MAT computation is irrelevant as present case involves regular computation u/s 44 specific to insurance business. Profits from sale of investments must be included post 01.04.2011 due to amended Rule 5(b). High Court ruled in favor of assessee.
Insurance company computing income u/s 44 is not required to include profits from sale of investments for periods prior to 01.04.2011 as per Rule 5, aligning with decisions in United Insurance Company and Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Apollo Tyres Ltd. judgment on MAT computation is irrelevant as present case involves regular computation u/s 44 specific to insurance business. Profits from sale of investments must be included post 01.04.2011 due to amended Rule 5(b). High Court ruled in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.