Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The assessee claimed weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) for donation made to M/s Shri Arvindo Institute of Applied Scientific Research Trust at the end of the year. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction, stating that the assessee had business loss and did not carry out any business after selling the factory land. The Tribunal held that the computation of income chargeable under the head "Capital Gain" is governed by Section 48, allowing deductions for expenditure incurred in connection with transfer of capital asset, cost of acquisition, and cost of improvement. Section 48 does not provide for deduction u/s 35(1)(ii). Allowing such deduction would be against the provisions of the Act. The CBDT clarified that the trust was not approved u/s 35(1)(ii) after 31.03.2006 and had raised substantial donations on a "forged certificate." Therefore, the donation made by the assessee to the trust is ineligible for deduction u/s 35(1)(ii). The assessee's appeal was dismissed.
The assessee claimed weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) for donation made to M/s Shri Arvindo Institute of Applied Scientific Research Trust at the end of the year. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction, stating that the assessee had business loss and did not carry out any business after selling the factory land. The Tribunal held that the computation of income chargeable under the head "Capital Gain" is governed by Section 48, allowing deductions for expenditure incurred in connection with transfer of capital asset, cost of acquisition, and cost of improvement. Section 48 does not provide for deduction u/s 35(1)(ii). Allowing such deduction would be against the provisions of the Act. The CBDT clarified that the trust was not approved u/s 35(1)(ii) after 31.03.2006 and had raised substantial donations on a "forged certificate." Therefore, the donation made by the assessee to the trust is ineligible for deduction u/s 35(1)(ii). The assessee's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.