Capital gains under Section 48 cannot claim weighted deduction for research donations under Section 35(1)(ii)

ITAT Surat dismissed the assessee's appeal claiming weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) for donation to scientific research trust. The assessee earned capital gains from land sale and made year-end donation seeking deduction. The tribunal held that capital gains under Section 48 only permit specific deductions like transfer expenses and acquisition costs, not research donations under Section 35(1)(ii). Additionally, CBDT clarified the trust's approval expired in 2006, making it ineligible to receive donations for weighted deductions. The deduction was rightly disallowed by lower authorities.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Justification of the addition of Rs. 2,27,50,000/- claimed as deduction under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Continuation of business after the sale of factory land.
3. Eligibility of the donation made to M/s Shri Arvindo Institute of Applied Scientific Research Trust for deduction under Section 35(1)(ii).

Detailed Analysis:

1. Justification of the Addition of Rs. 2,27,50,000/- Claimed as Deduction under Section 35(1)(ii):
The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 2,27,50,000/- under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on a donation made to M/s Shri Arvindo Institute of Applied Scientific Research Trust. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed this deduction, stating that the donation was made out of long-term capital gains (LTCG) from the sale of factory land, and not from business income. The AO observed that the business had been discontinued after the sale of the factory land on 07.07.2014, hence the deduction under Section 35(1)(ii) could not be claimed. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, noting that the deduction under Section 35(1)(ii) could only be claimed from business income and not from capital gains.

2. Continuation of Business After the Sale of Factory Land:
The assessee argued that the business continued after the sale of the factory land, as the operations were shifted to a new location at Palej, GIDC, Bharuch, Gujarat. The assessee provided evidence such as closing stock, electricity bills, and sales registers to support this claim. However, the AO and CIT(A) found these claims unconvincing, noting the absence of a lease agreement or confirmation from the buyer, TBEA Energy (India) Pvt. Ltd., to substantiate the continued business operations. The Tribunal agreed with the lower authorities, stating that the sale of the factory land indicated the discontinuation of business and that the subsequent sale of closing stock did not establish the continuation of business.

3. Eligibility of the Donation Made to M/s Shri Arvindo Institute of Applied Scientific Research Trust for Deduction under Section 35(1)(ii):
The Tribunal noted that M/s Shri Arvindo Institute of Applied Scientific Research Trust was not approved under Section 35(1)(ii) after 31.03.2006, as clarified by the CBDT. The trust had raised substantial donations based on a "forged certificate," making the donation ineligible for deduction under Section 35(1)(ii). The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 2,27,50,000/- made by the AO, stating that the donation was not eligible for deduction as the trust was not recognized for the purpose of Section 35(1)(ii).

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee, upholding the disallowance of the deduction claimed under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Act. The Tribunal found that the business had been discontinued after the sale of the factory land and that the donation made to M/s Shri Arvindo Institute of Applied Scientific Research Trust was not eligible for deduction. The order was pronounced on 06/09/2024 in the open court.

---