Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The assessee claimed weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) for donation made to M/s Shri Arvindo Institute of Applied Scientific Research Trust at the end of the year. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction, stating that the assessee had business loss and did not carry out any business after selling the factory land. The Tribunal held that the computation of income chargeable under the head "Capital Gain" is governed by Section 48, allowing deductions for expenditure incurred in connection with transfer of capital asset, cost of acquisition, and cost of improvement. Section 48 does not provide for deduction u/s 35(1)(ii). Allowing such deduction would be against the provisions of the Act. The CBDT clarified that the trust was not approved u/s 35(1)(ii) after 31.03.2006 and had raised substantial donations on a "forged certificate." Therefore, the donation made by the assessee to the trust is ineligible for deduction u/s 35(1)(ii). The assessee's appeal was dismissed.
The assessee claimed weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) for donation made to M/s Shri Arvindo Institute of Applied Scientific Research Trust at the end of the year. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction, stating that the assessee had business loss and did not carry out any business after selling the factory land. The Tribunal held that the computation of income chargeable under the head "Capital Gain" is governed by Section 48, allowing deductions for expenditure incurred in connection with transfer of capital asset, cost of acquisition, and cost of improvement. Section 48 does not provide for deduction u/s 35(1)(ii). Allowing such deduction would be against the provisions of the Act. The CBDT clarified that the trust was not approved u/s 35(1)(ii) after 31.03.2006 and had raised substantial donations on a "forged certificate." Therefore, the donation made by the assessee to the trust is ineligible for deduction u/s 35(1)(ii). The assessee's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
