Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) arises when an interest-free loan is provided by a company to a substantially related concern in shareholding. The issue was whether the deemed dividend is taxable in the hands of the concern receiving the loan or in the hands of the common shareholder. The Tribunal, relying on Delhi and Bombay High Court decisions, held that the deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) is taxable only in the hands of the shareholder. The contention that since a common entity held more than 10% shares in both the lender and borrower companies, the loan attracted section 2(22)(e) was rejected. The Tribunal ruled that the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) in the hands of the assessee-borrower was required to be deleted.
Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) arises when an interest-free loan is provided by a company to a substantially related concern in shareholding. The issue was whether the deemed dividend is taxable in the hands of the concern receiving the loan or in the hands of the common shareholder. The Tribunal, relying on Delhi and Bombay High Court decisions, held that the deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) is taxable only in the hands of the shareholder. The contention that since a common entity held more than 10% shares in both the lender and borrower companies, the loan attracted section 2(22)(e) was rejected. The Tribunal ruled that the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) in the hands of the assessee-borrower was required to be deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.