Section 2(22)(e) deemed dividend only applies to actual shareholders of lending company, not related entities with common shareholders. (22)(e)

ITAT Hyderabad ruled that deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) cannot be taxed in the hands of a borrower company merely because both lender and borrower have common substantial shareholders. The provision applies only to actual shareholders of the lending company, not to related entities. Since the assessee was not a shareholder of the lender, despite common shareholding through a third party holding over 10% in both companies, section 2(22)(e) was inapplicable. The addition made by AO was deleted and the assessee's appeal was allowed.

---

---

Issues:
Interpretation of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding deemed dividend and its applicability to shareholders and concerns with substantial interest.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Background:
The case involves M/s. Agarwal Sponge & Energy Private Limited appealing against an order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2013-14. The dispute revolves around the addition of Rs. 16,68,33,979 as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Act.

2. Assessment by Assessing Officer (AO):
The AO added the amount as deemed dividend due to a loan obtained by the assessee from a related company, M/s. Agarwal Industries Pvt Ltd, with accumulated profits. The AO invoked section 2(22)(e) based on the common shareholding between the companies.

3. Decision by CIT(A):
The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, citing judicial precedents and the interpretation of section 2(22)(e). The CIT(A) referred to the Supreme Court's clarification that deemed dividend is taxable in the hands of common shareholders with substantial interest.

4. Appellate Tribunal Decision:
The Appellate Tribunal analyzed the provisions of section 2(22)(e) and previous court decisions. It concluded that deemed dividend is taxable in the hands of shareholders only, not concerns with substantial interest. The Tribunal found that the loan recipient, the assessee, was not a shareholder of the lender, M/s. Agarwal Industries Pvt Ltd. Hence, the addition made by the AO was deemed incorrect, and the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 16,68,33,979.

5. Legal Interpretation:
The Tribunal's decision aligns with the interpretation that deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) applies to shareholders with substantial interest, not concerns. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of shareholding in determining the taxability of deemed dividends, as clarified by the Supreme Court in previous cases.

6. Conclusion:
The Tribunal's ruling in favor of the assessee highlights the significance of shareholder status in determining the tax liability for deemed dividends under section 2(22)(e). The decision provides clarity on the application of this provision and sets a precedent for similar cases involving related companies and loan transactions.

---