Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) arises when an interest-free loan is provided by a company to a substantially related concern in shareholding. The issue was whether the deemed dividend is taxable in the hands of the concern receiving the loan or in the hands of the common shareholder. The Tribunal, relying on Delhi and Bombay High Court decisions, held that the deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) is taxable only in the hands of the shareholder. The contention that since a common entity held more than 10% shares in both the lender and borrower companies, the loan attracted section 2(22)(e) was rejected. The Tribunal ruled that the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) in the hands of the assessee-borrower was required to be deleted.
Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) arises when an interest-free loan is provided by a company to a substantially related concern in shareholding. The issue was whether the deemed dividend is taxable in the hands of the concern receiving the loan or in the hands of the common shareholder. The Tribunal, relying on Delhi and Bombay High Court decisions, held that the deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) is taxable only in the hands of the shareholder. The contention that since a common entity held more than 10% shares in both the lender and borrower companies, the loan attracted section 2(22)(e) was rejected. The Tribunal ruled that the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) in the hands of the assessee-borrower was required to be deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.