Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Cash deposits made during demonetization period from cash withdrawals and rental income received in cash were substantiated through cash flow statements and bank statements. The assessee, not required to maintain books of accounts, explained the cash deposits as accumulated over time from salary, rent, and interest income. Lower authorities rejected the cash flow statement demonstrating cash balance of Rs. 25,09,620 as on 8-11-2016, despite no dispute over the cash balance itself. The Tribunal found the assessee's submissions detailing the deposited amounts during demonetization period unambiguous, allowing the appeal.
Cash deposits made during demonetization period from cash withdrawals and rental income received in cash were substantiated through cash flow statements and bank statements. The assessee, not required to maintain books of accounts, explained the cash deposits as accumulated over time from salary, rent, and interest income. Lower authorities rejected the cash flow statement demonstrating cash balance of Rs. 25,09,620 as on 8-11-2016, despite no dispute over the cash balance itself. The Tribunal found the assessee's submissions detailing the deposited amounts during demonetization period unambiguous, allowing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
