Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The court held that the tax liability arising from the deletion of additions under the remand order would be less than Rs. 1,00,00,000, rendering the appeal non-maintainable as per Circular No. 17/2019. Even if the appeal were allowed and remanded to the Tribunal, the subject matter would be Rs. 50,00,000, below the prescribed monetary limit. Considering the additions disallowed and the return, the tax liability would be less than Rs. 50,00,000, precluding the appeal before the Appellate Authority. Consequently, the court dismissed both appeals in accordance with Circular No. 17/2019, finding them undeserving of acceptance due to the low tax effect.
The court held that the tax liability arising from the deletion of additions under the remand order would be less than Rs. 1,00,00,000, rendering the appeal non-maintainable as per Circular No. 17/2019. Even if the appeal were allowed and remanded to the Tribunal, the subject matter would be Rs. 50,00,000, below the prescribed monetary limit. Considering the additions disallowed and the return, the tax liability would be less than Rs. 50,00,000, precluding the appeal before the Appellate Authority. Consequently, the court dismissed both appeals in accordance with Circular No. 17/2019, finding them undeserving of acceptance due to the low tax effect.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.