Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court quashed the order of the Interim Board for Settlement (IBS) rejecting the petitioner's settlement application u/s 245D(4). The court held that the IBS should consider the application, keeping open all objections/contentions of the revenue, including on the applicable threshold limits under the first proviso to Section 245C(1). The court did not examine the petitioner's challenge to the constitutional validity of these provisions, and all contentions of the petitioner were expressly kept open. The writ petition was disposed of without costs.
The High Court quashed the order of the Interim Board for Settlement (IBS) rejecting the petitioner's settlement application u/s 245D(4). The court held that the IBS should consider the application, keeping open all objections/contentions of the revenue, including on the applicable threshold limits under the first proviso to Section 245C(1). The court did not examine the petitioner's challenge to the constitutional validity of these provisions, and all contentions of the petitioner were expressly kept open. The writ petition was disposed of without costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.