Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Penalty under Customs Broker Licensing Regulation (CBLR) 2013 for violation of Regulation 17(9). Appellant not directly involved in act or omission by authorized signatory, no allegation of undue financial benefit. Cross-examination opportunity under Regulation 20(4) not provided despite reliance on statements of different persons. As per precedent, adjudication authority ought to have given opportunity for cross-examination before relying on such statements. Proceedings in violation of Regulation 20(4), not sustainable. Appeal allowed by Appellate Tribunal.
Penalty under Customs Broker Licensing Regulation (CBLR) 2013 for violation of Regulation 17(9). Appellant not directly involved in act or omission by authorized signatory, no allegation of undue financial benefit. Cross-examination opportunity under Regulation 20(4) not provided despite reliance on statements of different persons. As per precedent, adjudication authority ought to have given opportunity for cross-examination before relying on such statements. Proceedings in violation of Regulation 20(4), not sustainable. Appeal allowed by Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
