Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Immovable property purchased, stamp duty value higher than consideration paid. Assessee's request to refer matter to Valuation Officer ignored. Held: As property registered with area of 783.4 sq ft, assessee cannot claim different area. Stamp duty value of Rs. 2,00,17,500 exceeds consideration of Rs. 1.70 crores, hence difference treated as income u/s 56(2)(vii). No infirmity in CIT(A)'s order, appeal dismissed. Stamp duty value considered full value of consideration for Section 56(2)(vii) purposes.
Immovable property purchased, stamp duty value higher than consideration paid. Assessee's request to refer matter to Valuation Officer ignored. Held: As property registered with area of 783.4 sq ft, assessee cannot claim different area. Stamp duty value of Rs. 2,00,17,500 exceeds consideration of Rs. 1.70 crores, hence difference treated as income u/s 56(2)(vii). No infirmity in CIT(A)'s order, appeal dismissed. Stamp duty value considered full value of consideration for Section 56(2)(vii) purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
