Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcySeptember 6, 2024Case LawsAT
The NCLT had directed the release of an industrial promotion subsidy claim amount to the Corporate Debtor, which was sanctioned prior to the commencement of CIRP. The NCLAT held that after CIRP initiation, all amounts payable to the Corporate Debtor must be paid to the Corporate Debtor's account, and disbursement should occur as per the approved Resolution Plan by the CoC. The NCLAT set aside the direction to pay the subsidy amount directly to the government authorities and instead ordered that the unpaid subsidy amount be paid to the Corporate Debtor within the time allowed by the Adjudicating Authority.
The NCLT had directed the release of an industrial promotion subsidy claim amount to the Corporate Debtor, which was sanctioned prior to the commencement of CIRP. The NCLAT held that after CIRP initiation, all amounts payable to the Corporate Debtor must be paid to the Corporate Debtor's account, and disbursement should occur as per the approved Resolution Plan by the CoC. The NCLAT set aside the direction to pay the subsidy amount directly to the government authorities and instead ordered that the unpaid subsidy amount be paid to the Corporate Debtor within the time allowed by the Adjudicating Authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.