Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Adjusts Payment Order; Approves Industrial Subsidy Payment to Corporate Debtor as per Resolution Plan.</h1> <h3>Topworth Urja & Metals Ltd., Through Its RP Avil Menezes Versus Directorate of Industries, Govt. of Maharashtra</h3> The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the Adjudicating Authority's directive for payment to Government Authorities. It ordered the ... Seeking direction for release of payment of an amount sanctioned as Industrial Promotion Subsidy claim for the mega project of the Corporate Debtor - HELD THAT:- The CIRP against the Corporate Debtor commenced on 12.08.2022 and the letter dated 28.02.2022 which was relied in paragraph 5.2 was written by the erstwhile management. After the CIRP having commenced, all amount which is payable to the Corporate Debtor has to be given in the kitty of the Corporate Debtor and disbursement of the amount has to take place as per the Resolution Plan which has been approved by the CoC as submitted by the Counsel for the Appellant. The Appeal allowed in part and direction contained in paragraph 5.3 to the Principal Secretary, Directorate of Industries, Government of Maharashtra, to pay the amount of investment subsidy within 30 days in accordance with the disbursal advice to the Government Authorities as mentioned in paragraph 5.2 is set aside. Let the amount which has not yet been paid to the Corporate Debtor be paid to the Corporate Debtor within time as allowed by the Adjudicating Authority. Issues: Appeal against order for release of Industrial Promotion Subsidy claim for a Corporate Debtor during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).Detailed Analysis:1. Background of the Case:The appeal was filed against an order passed by the Adjudicating Authority in response to an application filed by the Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor seeking direction for the release of an Industrial Promotion Subsidy claim amounting to Rs.61,76,53,000. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor commenced on 12.08.2022.2. Adjudicating Authority's Decision:The Adjudicating Authority noted the sanction of the Investment Promotion Subsidy for the years 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20. It also mentioned a letter dated 28.02.2022 written by the previous management of the Corporate Debtor to the Ministry of Finance and Planning of Maharashtra, requesting the release of the amount to Government Authorities. The Adjudicating Authority directed the Principal Secretary, Directorate of Industries, Government of Maharashtra, to pay the amount within 30 days to the specified Government Authorities.3. Appellant's Argument:The Appellant contended that all amounts post-CIRP initiation should be paid to the Corporate Debtor and the claims of all authorities should be satisfied as per the approved Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC).4. Tribunal's Decision:After considering the submissions, the Tribunal reviewed the relevant paragraphs of the case detailing the subsidy amounts sanctioned and the disbursement approvals. The Tribunal noted that the letter relied upon by the Adjudicating Authority was from the previous management and emphasized that post-CIRP initiation, all payable amounts should go to the Corporate Debtor as per the approved Resolution Plan.5. Tribunal's Order:The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal and set aside the direction for payment to Government Authorities mentioned in the Adjudicating Authority's order. It directed the remaining unpaid amount to be paid to the Corporate Debtor within the allowed time. The Resolution Professional was given the liberty to take further necessary steps as per the law.6. Conclusion:The appeal was disposed of with the Tribunal's decision to allow the payment of the outstanding amount to the Corporate Debtor in accordance with the approved Resolution Plan, emphasizing the post-CIRP payment protocol.This detailed analysis encapsulates the key aspects and decisions of the judgment regarding the appeal against the release of the Industrial Promotion Subsidy claim for the Corporate Debtor during the CIRP.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found