Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Denial of exemption u/s 11 for assessment of a trust due to rejection of application for condonation of delay in filing Form 10B. The petitioner inadvertently delayed filing Form 10B due to the clerical staff of the Chartered Accountant suffering from a brain tumor. The High Court held that although the audit report was obtained on 07.05.2015, prior to the return filing date of 26.09.2015, the respondent adopted a pedantic approach in rejecting the condonation application. The reasons provided by the petitioner cannot be discarded as not constituting genuine hardship. The High Court quashed the impugned order, directing the respondent to condone the delay in filing Form 10B to enable the petitioner to obtain exemption u/s 11.
Denial of exemption u/s 11 for assessment of a trust due to rejection of application for condonation of delay in filing Form 10B. The petitioner inadvertently delayed filing Form 10B due to the clerical staff of the Chartered Accountant suffering from a brain tumor. The High Court held that although the audit report was obtained on 07.05.2015, prior to the return filing date of 26.09.2015, the respondent adopted a pedantic approach in rejecting the condonation application. The reasons provided by the petitioner cannot be discarded as not constituting genuine hardship. The High Court quashed the impugned order, directing the respondent to condone the delay in filing Form 10B to enable the petitioner to obtain exemption u/s 11.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
