Income Disclosure Scheme immunity and search-material requirements barred further share-transaction additions in unabated assessments under section 15...
Toy balloon tariff classification: functional heading prevails over residual rubber and festive article headings, supporting penalties for deliberate ...
Customs valuation using comparable contemporaneous imports can displace declared value, while missing speaking orders require pursuit before competent...
Denial of exemption u/s 11 for assessment of a trust due to rejection of application for condonation of delay in filing Form 10B. The petitioner inadvertently delayed filing Form 10B due to the clerical staff of the Chartered Accountant suffering from a brain tumor. The High Court held that although the audit report was obtained on 07.05.2015, prior to the return filing date of 26.09.2015, the respondent adopted a pedantic approach in rejecting the condonation application. The reasons provided by the petitioner cannot be discarded as not constituting genuine hardship. The High Court quashed the impugned order, directing the respondent to condone the delay in filing Form 10B to enable the petitioner to obtain exemption u/s 11.
Denial of exemption u/s 11 for assessment of a trust due to rejection of application for condonation of delay in filing Form 10B. The petitioner inadvertently delayed filing Form 10B due to the clerical staff of the Chartered Accountant suffering from a brain tumor. The High Court held that although the audit report was obtained on 07.05.2015, prior to the return filing date of 26.09.2015, the respondent adopted a pedantic approach in rejecting the condonation application. The reasons provided by the petitioner cannot be discarded as not constituting genuine hardship. The High Court quashed the impugned order, directing the respondent to condone the delay in filing Form 10B to enable the petitioner to obtain exemption u/s 11.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
