Employee recoveries, input tax credit and notice pay recovery under GST: AAR distinguishes taxable supplies from non-taxable perquisites and penalties...
Liberal construction of sufficient cause justifies condonation of inordinate delay where criminal proceedings and jail confinement explained the defau...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5041 to 5060 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In a case concerning liability for Goods and Services Tax (GST) arising from civil contracts with government departments, the petitioner sought another opportunity to establish non-liability. The petitioner expressed willingness to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. The High Court, with a view to provide an opportunity to the petitioner, set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks and submits a reply to the show cause within the same period. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
In a case concerning liability for Goods and Services Tax (GST) arising from civil contracts with government departments, the petitioner sought another opportunity to establish non-liability. The petitioner expressed willingness to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. The High Court, with a view to provide an opportunity to the petitioner, set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks and submits a reply to the show cause within the same period. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
