Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned GST assessment order was liable to be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The petitioner asserted that the underlying works were executed during the VAT regime and that GST was not payable. The respondent pointed out that the reply to the show-cause notice was not shown to have been received, no supporting invoices or proof of VAT payment were produced, and the petitioner had not participated in the proceedings. Even so, the Court found that the petitioner should be given one more opportunity to place materials and contest the demand, but only on terms.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for reconsideration, subject to deposit of 10% of the disputed tax demand and grant of a fresh opportunity, including personal hearing.