https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757914 The Madras High Court set aside the GST assessment order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration because the petitioner had not been given a full opportunity to place supporting material and contest the demand. Although the petitioner claimed the works were executed during the VAT regime and no GST was payable, the record showed no proof of receipt of the reply, no invoices or VAT payment evidence, and no effective participation in the proceedings. The Court therefore ordered reconsideration with a fresh personal hearing, subject to deposit of 10% of the disputed tax demand. en-us Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 May 2025 11:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757914 The Madras High Court set aside the GST assessment order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration because the petitioner had not been given a full opportunity to place supporting material and contest the demand. Although the petitioner claimed the works were executed during the VAT regime and no GST was payable, the record showed no proof of receipt of the reply, no invoices or VAT payment evidence, and no effective participation in the proceedings. The Court therefore ordered reconsideration with a fresh personal hearing, subject to deposit of 10% of the disputed tax demand. Case-Laws GST Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757914