Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3381 to 3400 of 96207 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In a case concerning liability for Goods and Services Tax (GST) arising from civil contracts with government departments, the petitioner sought another opportunity to establish non-liability. The petitioner expressed willingness to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. The High Court, with a view to provide an opportunity to the petitioner, set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks and submits a reply to the show cause within the same period. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
In a case concerning liability for Goods and Services Tax (GST) arising from civil contracts with government departments, the petitioner sought another opportunity to establish non-liability. The petitioner expressed willingness to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. The High Court, with a view to provide an opportunity to the petitioner, set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks and submits a reply to the show cause within the same period. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
