Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Non-compliance with provisions of the Goods and Services Tax Act, specifically Section 74(1) of the Central/Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, was raised regarding the illegality in issuance of notice. The court held that there were no grounds to entertain the writ petition on the stated illegality, as an explanation was sought for the discrepancy, and the assessee's reply was found unsatisfactory. However, this was only a preliminary step leading to the demand cum show-cause notice. The assessee is entitled to appear and raise objections against Annexure-1, if proceedings are not concluded. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed.
Non-compliance with provisions of the Goods and Services Tax Act, specifically Section 74(1) of the Central/Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, was raised regarding the illegality in issuance of notice. The court held that there were no grounds to entertain the writ petition on the stated illegality, as an explanation was sought for the discrepancy, and the assessee's reply was found unsatisfactory. However, this was only a preliminary step leading to the demand cum show-cause notice. The assessee is entitled to appear and raise objections against Annexure-1, if proceedings are not concluded. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
