Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Classification of peritoneal dialysis solution upheld under CTH 9018; binding precedent in the assessee's own case controlled the dispute.
    CIRP transparency and disclosure lapses justify rejection of resolution plan despite CoC approval and commercial wisdom
    Manganese ore processing creates concentrate, so the ore-only CVD exemption under Notification No. 04/2006-CE was denied.
    Forensic audit costs and investor restitution measures directed to support asset disposal and digital record transfer
    SVLDRS refund of redemption fine allowed where payment was made only under unlawful departmental insistence.
    Unauthorised trading and vicarious liability: HC upheld award where manipulated trades and broker responsibility were proved.
    Writ jurisdiction yields to statutory appeal where jurisdictional error and natural justice breach are not clearly established.
    Parallel GST proceedings require the same subject matter; distinct periods and allegations kept the later action valid.
    Effective personal hearing is mandatory on request; lack of prior notice vitiated the adjudication order for breach of natural justice.
    Service tax demand on Form 26AS data alone fails where taxability and extended limitation are not lawfully established.
    Proof of actual GST payment required before reimbursement claim can be examined under a government contract.
    Unconstitutional tax levy refund attracts compensatory interest from deposit date until refund, with statutory refund limits inapplicable.
    Natural justice breached when benchmark yield was fixed on undisclosed material; assessment orders were set aside and remanded.
    Transitional input tax credit under Section 140 cannot be denied by reading Section 140(5) to override pre-appointed-day credit carry forward.
    Writ maintainability and statutory pre-deposit: High Court sent the dispute to the functional appellate tribunal.
    Biodegradable bag classification turns on material and actual biodegradability; concessional GST applies only if the bags are truly biodegradable.
    Online coaching classified as training services, not OIDAR, making Rajasthan supplies intra-State for tax purposes.
    Draft assessment order must be served first before final assessment, preserving the taxpayer's DRP objection right.
    Merger of intimation into scrutiny assessment bars section 154 rectification based on an earlier adjustment.
    Reimbursement between project office and head office is a payment to self and not taxable fees for technical services.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The case pertains to a violation of the principles of natural...

Petitioner Denied Hearing: Court Remands for Proper Tax Determination under RGST/CGST Act Due to Breach of Justice.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

GST August 31, 2024 Case Laws HC
The case pertains to a violation of the principles of natural justice, wherein the petitioner's right to an opportunity for personal hearing, as provided under the law, was violated. The court held that Section 75 of the RGST Act/CGST Act contains provisions related to tax determination. Sub-section (2) states that if an Appellate Authority, Tribunal, or Court concludes that the notice issued u/s 74(1) is unsustainable due to non-establishment of fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts to evade tax, the proper officer shall determine the tax payable as if the notice was issued u/s 73(1). The respondents admitted that although they intended to grant an opportunity for personal hearing and uploaded notices, the petitioner claimed these were not reflected on their GSTIN Portal. The court found the statutory mandate was not complied with, and impugned orders were passed without affording the petitioner an opportunity for personal hearing. Consequently, the matters were remanded to the competent authority to provide an opportunity for personal hearing and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.

Topics

Acts Income Tax