<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Petitioner Denied Hearing: Court Remands for Proper Tax Determination under RGST/CGST Act Due to Breach of Justice.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80892</link>
    <description>The case pertains to a violation of the principles of natural justice, wherein the petitioner&#039;s right to an opportunity for personal hearing, as provided under the law, was violated. The court held that Section 75 of the RGST Act/CGST Act contains provisions related to tax determination. Sub-section (2) states that if an Appellate Authority, Tribunal, or Court concludes that the notice issued u/s 74(1) is unsustainable due to non-establishment of fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts to evade tax, the proper officer shall determine the tax payable as if the notice was issued u/s 73(1). The respondents admitted that although they intended to grant an opportunity for personal hearing and uploaded notices, the petitioner claimed.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2024 07:54:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2024 07:54:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Petitioner Denied Hearing: Court Remands for Proper Tax Determination under RGST/CGST Act Due to Breach of Justice.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80892</link>
      <description>The case pertains to a violation of the principles of natural justice, wherein the petitioner&#039;s right to an opportunity for personal hearing, as provided under the law, was violated. The court held that Section 75 of the RGST Act/CGST Act contains provisions related to tax determination. Sub-section (2) states that if an Appellate Authority, Tribunal, or Court concludes that the notice issued u/s 74(1) is unsustainable due to non-establishment of fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts to evade tax, the proper officer shall determine the tax payable as if the notice was issued u/s 73(1). The respondents admitted that although they intended to grant an opportunity for personal hearing and uploaded notices, the petitioner claimed.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2024 07:54:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>