Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Transfer pricing on overdue receivables remitted for fresh interest benchmarking, while double additions and credit errors were corrected.
    Consequential penalty orders cannot survive once the underlying quantum assessment is quashed.
    Related-party consultancy charges and vehicle-loan interest were accepted as genuine business expenditure, with disallowances deleted.
    Penalty limitation under section 275(1)(c) ran from AO's initiation recommendation, making the later penalty order time-barred.
    Transfer pricing comparables and receivables interest: KPO exclusion, LIBOR plus 200 basis points, and case-specific credit period applied.
    Limited scrutiny exceeded without approval; partner-funded bank credits were not taxable as firm business income
    Knowledge of concealed goods required for penalty against Customs House Agent under customs law
    Separate penalty on partner and firm barred for the same contravention; admission supported false declaration penalty but amount was reduced.
    Show cause notice and timely adjudication requirements invalidated customs recovery after a decades-long delay and excess demand.
    Classification of automatic soap dispensers turns on dispersing versus spraying, with Chapter 8424 applying to foam dispensing.
    Mandatory appeal limitation under customs law bars condonation beyond the statutory outer limit and excludes the Limitation Act.
    Provisional release conditions must be proportionate; CESTAT reduced onerous bank guarantees while retaining full-value bonds
    Reduced penalty under Section 114A cannot be extended to Section 112(ii) customs penalties; matter remanded for redetermination.
    Natural justice bars fraud classification based on undisclosed material and a non-speaking order; notice and order quashed.
    Post-petition transfer validation under winding-up law upheld for a bona fide transaction benefiting creditors and lacking fraud.
    Section 244 waiver threshold upheld where prima facie oppression, mismanagement, and articles violations supported the petition.
    Section 7 insolvency cannot be used for coercive recovery where a quadripartite transaction is predominantly contractual.
    Limitation under Section 14 extends to prior IBC proceedings barred by pre-existing dispute, keeping the civil suit timely.
    Limitation under insolvency appeals starts from open-court pronouncement, with no condonation beyond the statutory outer limit.
    Project completion and CoC approval in insolvency: NCLAT rejects one promoter proposal, permits another subject to creditor consent.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The case pertains to a violation of the principles of natural...

Petitioner Denied Hearing: Court Remands for Proper Tax Determination under RGST/CGST Act Due to Breach of Justice.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

GST August 31, 2024 Case Laws HC
The case pertains to a violation of the principles of natural justice, wherein the petitioner's right to an opportunity for personal hearing, as provided under the law, was violated. The court held that Section 75 of the RGST Act/CGST Act contains provisions related to tax determination. Sub-section (2) states that if an Appellate Authority, Tribunal, or Court concludes that the notice issued u/s 74(1) is unsustainable due to non-establishment of fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts to evade tax, the proper officer shall determine the tax payable as if the notice was issued u/s 73(1). The respondents admitted that although they intended to grant an opportunity for personal hearing and uploaded notices, the petitioner claimed these were not reflected on their GSTIN Portal. The court found the statutory mandate was not complied with, and impugned orders were passed without affording the petitioner an opportunity for personal hearing. Consequently, the matters were remanded to the competent authority to provide an opportunity for personal hearing and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.

Topics

Acts Income Tax