Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The appeal centered around the import of consignments comprising 'frames' and 'slides' of handguns by the writ petitioner (Syndicate), which were seized by the respondents. The key issue was whether Syndicate's import license for 'frames' and 'slides' covered other pre-fitted parts like firing pins, extractors, and hammers under the relevant Act and Rules. The court held that by issuing Form X to Syndicate, the appellants (authorities) had effectively granted clearance for the imported 'frames' and 'slides' with pre-fitted components. The appellants did not object to the pre-fitted parts when Form X was issued, despite being aware of the pending litigation on whether separate licenses were required for embedded sub-components. The court ruled that once Form X was issued, the requirements of separate permissions u/rs 57(4) and 88(2) were deemed satisfied. The court concluded that the appellants' objections regarding separate licenses for pre-fitted parts and permissions u/r 57(4) were afterthoughts. The ex post facto issuance of Form X implied that an importer with a license for 'frames' and 'slides' did not need separate licenses or permissions for pre-fitted components. Consequently, the restriction on Syndicate's disposal of the imported goods was dissolved, and the appeal was disposed of.
The appeal centered around the import of consignments comprising 'frames' and 'slides' of handguns by the writ petitioner (Syndicate), which were seized by the respondents. The key issue was whether Syndicate's import license for 'frames' and 'slides' covered other pre-fitted parts like firing pins, extractors, and hammers under the relevant Act and Rules. The court held that by issuing Form X to Syndicate, the appellants (authorities) had effectively granted clearance for the imported 'frames' and 'slides' with pre-fitted components. The appellants did not object to the pre-fitted parts when Form X was issued, despite being aware of the pending litigation on whether separate licenses were required for embedded sub-components. The court ruled that once Form X was issued, the requirements of separate permissions u/rs 57(4) and 88(2) were deemed satisfied. The court concluded that the appellants' objections regarding separate licenses for pre-fitted parts and permissions u/r 57(4) were afterthoughts. The ex post facto issuance of Form X implied that an importer with a license for 'frames' and 'slides' did not need separate licenses or permissions for pre-fitted components. Consequently, the restriction on Syndicate's disposal of the imported goods was dissolved, and the appeal was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.