Import licence for handgun frames and slides covered pre-fitted parts; no separate permission was required under the licensing scheme.

An unqualified import licence in Form X for handgun frames and slides covered consignments containing pre-fitted operational parts, because the licence did not restrict import to bare components and was issued by the competent authority with knowledge of the disputed contents. The explanatory references in Forms VII and X-A were confined to manufacture and export and could not be read into the import regime under Form X. The court also found no material showing that frames and slides are never traded with pre-fitted components, and it accepted that the licensing scheme under Rule 57(4) did not require a separate licence or permission on these facts.

---

---

Issues: Whether the import licence granted for "frames" and "slides" of handguns included the pre-fitted operational parts found in the consignments, and whether the importer was required to obtain any separate licence or permission under the Arms Rules, 2016.

Analysis: The import licence issued in Form X was unqualified and unconditional and did not state that "frames" and "slides" had to be imported only without embedded sub-components. The licence was granted by the competent authority after the dispute had arisen and despite knowledge that the consignments contained pre-fitted parts such as firing pin, extractor and hammer. The Court held that the explanatory references in Forms VII and X-A were meant for manufacture and export and could not be imported into the import regime under Form X. It further found no material to show that, in trade or industry, frames and slides are never understood to be supplied with pre-fitted components. On Rule 57(4), the Court accepted that the subsequently issued Form X and the licensing scheme did not support a separate permission requirement in the circumstances of the case.

Conclusion: The imported consignments were not in violation of the import licence, and no separate licence or permission was required for the pre-fitted parts; the objection was rejected and the appeal failed.

---