Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Violation of Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Special Economic Zones Rules, 2006, and Customs Act regarding smuggling into the NSEZ. Determination of whether a customs officer is a Proper Officer under the SEZ Act. Failure to establish contravention of Sections 111(m), 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of Customs Act. Section 110 of Customs Act not a notified offence under SEZ Act. Lack of notification authorizing NSEZ officers to seize goods, rendering seizure and subsequent confiscation u/s 111(m) unsustainable. Vehicles used without knowledge of owner or person-in-charge, invalidating confiscation u/s 115(2). Confiscation of goods, seizure of vehicles, and penalty imposed on the Appellant set aside. Impugned orders quashed, appeal allowed.
Violation of Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Special Economic Zones Rules, 2006, and Customs Act regarding smuggling into the NSEZ. Determination of whether a customs officer is a Proper Officer under the SEZ Act. Failure to establish contravention of Sections 111(m), 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of Customs Act. Section 110 of Customs Act not a notified offence under SEZ Act. Lack of notification authorizing NSEZ officers to seize goods, rendering seizure and subsequent confiscation u/s 111(m) unsustainable. Vehicles used without knowledge of owner or person-in-charge, invalidating confiscation u/s 115(2). Confiscation of goods, seizure of vehicles, and penalty imposed on the Appellant set aside. Impugned orders quashed, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
