Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Violation of Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Special Economic Zones Rules, 2006, and Customs Act regarding smuggling into the NSEZ. Determination of whether a customs officer is a Proper Officer under the SEZ Act. Failure to establish contravention of Sections 111(m), 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of Customs Act. Section 110 of Customs Act not a notified offence under SEZ Act. Lack of notification authorizing NSEZ officers to seize goods, rendering seizure and subsequent confiscation u/s 111(m) unsustainable. Vehicles used without knowledge of owner or person-in-charge, invalidating confiscation u/s 115(2). Confiscation of goods, seizure of vehicles, and penalty imposed on the Appellant set aside. Impugned orders quashed, appeal allowed.
Violation of Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Special Economic Zones Rules, 2006, and Customs Act regarding smuggling into the NSEZ. Determination of whether a customs officer is a Proper Officer under the SEZ Act. Failure to establish contravention of Sections 111(m), 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of Customs Act. Section 110 of Customs Act not a notified offence under SEZ Act. Lack of notification authorizing NSEZ officers to seize goods, rendering seizure and subsequent confiscation u/s 111(m) unsustainable. Vehicles used without knowledge of owner or person-in-charge, invalidating confiscation u/s 115(2). Confiscation of goods, seizure of vehicles, and penalty imposed on the Appellant set aside. Impugned orders quashed, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
