Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Imposition of countervailing duty (CVD) on imports of stainless steel coils and plates from China, confiscation and penalties, duty drawback claims, and amendment of shipping bills. The Tribunal held that the imports on 12.10.2017 were liable for CVD u/s 9 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, as the exemption notification was issued later on 13.10.2017. While upholding the CVD demand, the Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods u/s 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, and penalties u/ss 112(a), 114A, and 114AA, citing lack of evidence. The appellants' duty drawback claim and request for amendment of shipping bills u/s 149 were allowed, directing the Commissioner to examine and provide relief as per law. The Tribunal relied on relevant legal provisions, notifications, and judicial precedents in its decision.
Imposition of countervailing duty (CVD) on imports of stainless steel coils and plates from China, confiscation and penalties, duty drawback claims, and amendment of shipping bills. The Tribunal held that the imports on 12.10.2017 were liable for CVD u/s 9 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, as the exemption notification was issued later on 13.10.2017. While upholding the CVD demand, the Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods u/s 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, and penalties u/ss 112(a), 114A, and 114AA, citing lack of evidence. The appellants' duty drawback claim and request for amendment of shipping bills u/s 149 were allowed, directing the Commissioner to examine and provide relief as per law. The Tribunal relied on relevant legal provisions, notifications, and judicial precedents in its decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
