Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Imports one day before CVD exemption notification upheld duty liability but penalties set aside under Section 111</h1> <h3>Hindustan Inox Limited, Hemant Bohra and Vimal Bohra Versus Commissioner of Customs, Nhava Sheva-II and III</h3> Hindustan Inox Limited, Hemant Bohra and Vimal Bohra Versus Commissioner of Customs, Nhava Sheva-II and III - TMI Issues Involved:1. Liability for payment of Countervailing Duty (CVD) on imported stainless steel coils and plates from China.2. Confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalties under Sections 111(d), 112(a), and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962.3. Denial of exemption from compliance with Rule 13(1)(a) of the Drawback Rules, 2017, and amendment of shipping bills under Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962.Detailed Analysis:1. Liability for Payment of Countervailing Duty (CVD):The Tribunal examined whether the import of stainless steel coils and plates from China on 12.10.2017 was liable for CVD under Section 9 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The goods were imported under Advance Authorization Licenses, and the appellants claimed exemption based on Notification No.18/2015-Customs. However, the exemption for CVD was introduced only on 13.10.2017 via Notification No.79/2017-Customs. The Tribunal concluded that the exemption could not be applied retrospectively, and the imports were liable for CVD as the notification providing exemption came into effect after the import date. Thus, the confirmation of CVD demand by the Commissioner of Customs was upheld.2. Confiscation and Penalties:The Tribunal reviewed the confiscation of goods under Section 111(d) and the imposition of penalties under Sections 112(a) and 114AA of the Customs Act. The Commissioner of Customs had found that the appellants suppressed facts and did not pay the applicable CVD, justifying confiscation and penalties. However, the Tribunal noted that the appellants had a bona fide belief that CVD was not payable under Advance Licenses and had made several representations to authorities seeking clarification. The Tribunal found no evidence of collusion, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts by the appellants. Consequently, the penalties under Sections 112(a) and 114AA were deemed unsustainable and were set aside.3. Denial of Exemption and Amendment of Shipping Bills:The Tribunal addressed the denial of exemption from compliance with Rule 13(1)(a) of the Drawback Rules and the amendment of shipping bills under Section 149. The Commissioner of Customs had rejected the appellants' requests, citing procedural non-compliance and time-barred applications. The Tribunal found that the legal provisions did not prescribe a specific time limit for such amendments and that the time limit introduced by Circular No.36/2010-Customs had been struck down by various court judgments. The Tribunal referenced several High Court and Supreme Court judgments that supported the appellants' position. The Tribunal concluded that the denial of the appellants' requests was inconsistent with legal provisions and directed the jurisdictional Commissioner of Customs to examine the application for drawback benefits as per law.Conclusion:The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of CVD demand but set aside the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties. It also directed the jurisdictional Commissioner to reconsider the appellants' application for drawback benefits and amendment of shipping bills. The appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants with consequential relief.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found