Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 23, 2024Case LawsAT
The appellant sought interim relief for reappointment as Secretary u/s 218 of the Companies Act, 2013, claiming termination violated Section 218(1)(b) which requires Tribunal's approval for removal. The NCLT had previously rejected the Section 218 application. The appellant repeatedly raised unconnected issues regarding applications CA-88/2023 and CA-34/2024 despite the Tribunal's observations on early disposal. The Court has the right to conduct proceedings orderly and resist attempts to repeatedly raise unconnected issues. The appellant conveniently omitted referring to the earlier NCLT order rejecting relief u/s 218. No grounds were made to interfere with the NCLT's impugned order. The appeal was dismissed.
The appellant sought interim relief for reappointment as Secretary u/s 218 of the Companies Act, 2013, claiming termination violated Section 218(1)(b) which requires Tribunal's approval for removal. The NCLT had previously rejected the Section 218 application. The appellant repeatedly raised unconnected issues regarding applications CA-88/2023 and CA-34/2024 despite the Tribunal's observations on early disposal. The Court has the right to conduct proceedings orderly and resist attempts to repeatedly raise unconnected issues. The appellant conveniently omitted referring to the earlier NCLT order rejecting relief u/s 218. No grounds were made to interfere with the NCLT's impugned order. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
