https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80622 The appellant sought interim relief for reappointment as Secretary u/s 218 of the Companies Act, 2013, claiming termination violated Section 218(1)(b) which requires Tribunal's approval for removal. The NCLT had previously rejected the Section 218 application. The appellant repeatedly raised unconnected issues regarding applications CA-88/2023 and CA-34/2024 despite the Tribunal's observations on early disposal. The Court has the right to conduct proceedings orderly and resist attempts to repeatedly raise unconnected issues. The appellant conveniently omitted referring to the earlier NCLT order rejecting relief u/s 218. No grounds were made to interfere with the NCLT's impugned order. The appeal was dismissed. en-us Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:14:38 +0530 Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:14:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80622 The appellant sought interim relief for reappointment as Secretary u/s 218 of the Companies Act, 2013, claiming termination violated Section 218(1)(b) which requires Tribunal's approval for removal. The NCLT had previously rejected the Section 218 application. The appellant repeatedly raised unconnected issues regarding applications CA-88/2023 and CA-34/2024 despite the Tribunal's observations on early disposal. The Court has the right to conduct proceedings orderly and resist attempts to repeatedly raise unconnected issues. The appellant conveniently omitted referring to the earlier NCLT order rejecting relief u/s 218. No grounds were made to interfere with the NCLT's impugned order. The appeal was dismissed. Highlights Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:14:38 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80622