Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The High Court held that Section 249(4)(a) does not mandate payment of admitted tax before filing an appeal, contrary to the Revenue's contention. The ITAT merely interpreted Section 249(4)(a) regarding entertaining appeals where the amount is deposited before or after filing, without adjudicating merits. As the ITAT order was not erroneous and remanded the matter for adjudication on merits based on precedents, the High Court found no merit in the Revenue's appeal.
The High Court held that Section 249(4)(a) does not mandate payment of admitted tax before filing an appeal, contrary to the Revenue's contention. The ITAT merely interpreted Section 249(4)(a) regarding entertaining appeals where the amount is deposited before or after filing, without adjudicating merits. As the ITAT order was not erroneous and remanded the matter for adjudication on merits based on precedents, the High Court found no merit in the Revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
