Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessment proceedings examined assessee's claim relating to ICDS adjustment made in intimation u/s 143(1). AO issued notices seeking information, assessee provided explanations and documentation supporting claim. AO passed assessment order without adverse findings, indicating acceptance of assessee's claim. However, while computing income, AO considered figure from section 143(1) intimation without deleting ICDS adjustment, despite examining and accepting assessee's claim during assessment proceedings. ITAT found AO should have deleted ICDS adjustment after duly examining and accepting assessee's claim. Consequently, ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s order and directed deletion of ICDS adjustment, allowing assessee's appeal.
Assessment proceedings examined assessee's claim relating to ICDS adjustment made in intimation u/s 143(1). AO issued notices seeking information, assessee provided explanations and documentation supporting claim. AO passed assessment order without adverse findings, indicating acceptance of assessee's claim. However, while computing income, AO considered figure from section 143(1) intimation without deleting ICDS adjustment, despite examining and accepting assessee's claim during assessment proceedings. ITAT found AO should have deleted ICDS adjustment after duly examining and accepting assessee's claim. Consequently, ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s order and directed deletion of ICDS adjustment, allowing assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
