<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax officer&#039;s oversight: ICDS adjustment wrongly considered despite examining &amp; accepting assessee&#039;s claim.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80597</link>
    <description>Assessment proceedings examined assessee&#039;s claim relating to ICDS adjustment made in intimation u/s 143(1). AO issued notices seeking information, assessee provided explanations and documentation supporting claim. AO passed assessment order without adverse findings, indicating acceptance of assessee&#039;s claim. However, while computing income, AO considered figure from section 143(1) intimation without deleting ICDS adjustment, despite examining and accepting assessee&#039;s claim during assessment proceedings. ITAT found AO should have deleted ICDS adjustment after duly examining and accepting assessee&#039;s claim. Consequently, ITAT set aside CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed deletion of ICDS adjustment, allowing assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:08:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:08:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax officer&#039;s oversight: ICDS adjustment wrongly considered despite examining &amp; accepting assessee&#039;s claim.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80597</link>
      <description>Assessment proceedings examined assessee&#039;s claim relating to ICDS adjustment made in intimation u/s 143(1). AO issued notices seeking information, assessee provided explanations and documentation supporting claim. AO passed assessment order without adverse findings, indicating acceptance of assessee&#039;s claim. However, while computing income, AO considered figure from section 143(1) intimation without deleting ICDS adjustment, despite examining and accepting assessee&#039;s claim during assessment proceedings. ITAT found AO should have deleted ICDS adjustment after duly examining and accepting assessee&#039;s claim. Consequently, ITAT set aside CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed deletion of ICDS adjustment, allowing assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:08:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>