Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Assessment proceedings examined assessee's claim relating to ICDS adjustment made in intimation u/s 143(1). AO issued notices seeking information, assessee provided explanations and documentation supporting claim. AO passed assessment order without adverse findings, indicating acceptance of assessee's claim. However, while computing income, AO considered figure from section 143(1) intimation without deleting ICDS adjustment, despite examining and accepting assessee's claim during assessment proceedings. ITAT found AO should have deleted ICDS adjustment after duly examining and accepting assessee's claim. Consequently, ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s order and directed deletion of ICDS adjustment, allowing assessee's appeal.
Assessment proceedings examined assessee's claim relating to ICDS adjustment made in intimation u/s 143(1). AO issued notices seeking information, assessee provided explanations and documentation supporting claim. AO passed assessment order without adverse findings, indicating acceptance of assessee's claim. However, while computing income, AO considered figure from section 143(1) intimation without deleting ICDS adjustment, despite examining and accepting assessee's claim during assessment proceedings. ITAT found AO should have deleted ICDS adjustment after duly examining and accepting assessee's claim. Consequently, ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s order and directed deletion of ICDS adjustment, allowing assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
