Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Shares granted under Employees Stock Purchase Scheme (ESPS) had a lock-in period and could not be traded in the open market. The Fair Market Value (FMV) could not exceed the face value of INR 15 due to the restriction on marketability and tradeability. The Valuation Report by the employer for withholding tax purposes could not be considered for determining FMV. The quoted price or Valuation Report had no application for shares subject to lock-in and sale embargo. The value of stock purchase option exercised by the employee is reckoned at face value, not the market price difference from the cost paid to the employer. The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming that face value alone is conclusive for taxation purposes.
Shares granted under Employees Stock Purchase Scheme (ESPS) had a lock-in period and could not be traded in the open market. The Fair Market Value (FMV) could not exceed the face value of INR 15 due to the restriction on marketability and tradeability. The Valuation Report by the employer for withholding tax purposes could not be considered for determining FMV. The quoted price or Valuation Report had no application for shares subject to lock-in and sale embargo. The value of stock purchase option exercised by the employee is reckoned at face value, not the market price difference from the cost paid to the employer. The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming that face value alone is conclusive for taxation purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.