Employee receives shares under stock purchase scheme with trading restrictions valued at face value not market price for tax

Delhi HC ruled in favor of assessee regarding taxation of shares under Employee Stock Purchase Scheme. Court held that shares subject to lock-in restrictions preventing market trading should be valued at face value (INR 15) rather than Fair Market Value for tax purposes. The valuation report used by employer for withholding tax obligations could not determine FMV for restricted shares. Court concluded that face value alone is conclusive for taxation when shares cannot be sold in open market due to complete embargo on sale.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the Tribunal erred in law in confirming the addition of Rs. 86,28,750/- as perquisite value of shares granted under the Employees Stock Purchase Scheme (ESPS)Rs.
2. Whether the value of stock purchase options exercised by the employee/assessee should be reckoned on the date of exercising such option and taxed for the difference in market price and cost paid by the assessee to its employerRs.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Addition of Rs. 86,28,750/- as Perquisite Value
The core issue revolves around the valuation of shares allotted under the ESPS, which were subject to a lock-in period. The assessee was allotted 11,50,500 shares at INR 15/- per share, with a portion subjected to a lock-in period. The shares were not marketable due to this restriction. The Assessing Officer (AO) determined the market price at INR 49.45 per share, resulting in a perquisite value addition of INR 3,96,34,725/-. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT (A)] and the Tribunal both concluded that the fair market value (FMV) should be INR 22.50 per share, based on a valuation report by M/s Ernst and Young. However, the High Court found that the FMV could not exceed the face value of INR 15/- due to the lock-in period, rendering the shares non-marketable. The Court held that the valuation report was only for withholding tax obligations and should not determine FMV for taxation purposes.

Issue 2: Valuation Date and Taxation of Stock Purchase Options
The second issue concerns the appropriate date for valuing the stock purchase options and the method of taxation. The AO had used the market price at the time of allotment, while the CIT (A) and Tribunal used the valuation report. The High Court referenced the Supreme Court's decision in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Infosys Technologies Ltd., which emphasized that shares under a lock-in period have no realizable value, and any benefit is notional and unascertainable. The Court ruled that the face value of INR 15/- should be considered for taxation, not the market price or valuation report.

Conclusion:
The High Court concluded that the FMV could not exceed the face value of the shares due to the lock-in period, thus answering Question 1 in favor of the assessee. Question 2 was answered in the negative, establishing that the face value should be the basis for taxation. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed, and the Commissioner's appeal was dismissed, setting aside the Tribunal's order dated 27 April 2007.

---