Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Non-disclosure of income from maintenance charges was challenged. The assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting, and non-receipt of maintenance charges cannot be the basis for not crediting income. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, and the ITAT upheld the order, citing a lack of evidence suggesting the assessee received the maintenance charges. Late deposit of ESI funds was disallowed u/s 36(1)(va) based on the Supreme Court's judgment in Checkmate Services P. Ltd, which held that employees' contributions not paid within the due date are not allowable. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the AO's order. Regarding the disallowance u/s 14A, the addition was restricted to the extent of exempt income, following the Delhi High Court's judgment in Joint Investment Pvt. Ltd. The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s order. The addition made on account of income from house property was deleted by the CIT(A), relying on the Supreme Court's judgment in M/S CHENNAI PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS LTD and the Delhi High Court's judgment in M/S ANSAL HOUSING FINANCE AND LEASING CO LTD & OTHERS. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order, citing a lack of contrary material.
Non-disclosure of income from maintenance charges was challenged. The assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting, and non-receipt of maintenance charges cannot be the basis for not crediting income. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, and the ITAT upheld the order, citing a lack of evidence suggesting the assessee received the maintenance charges. Late deposit of ESI funds was disallowed u/s 36(1)(va) based on the Supreme Court's judgment in Checkmate Services P. Ltd, which held that employees' contributions not paid within the due date are not allowable. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the AO's order. Regarding the disallowance u/s 14A, the addition was restricted to the extent of exempt income, following the Delhi High Court's judgment in Joint Investment Pvt. Ltd. The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s order. The addition made on account of income from house property was deleted by the CIT(A), relying on the Supreme Court's judgment in M/S CHENNAI PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS LTD and the Delhi High Court's judgment in M/S ANSAL HOUSING FINANCE AND LEASING CO LTD & OTHERS. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order, citing a lack of contrary material.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
