<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Income Disclosures, ESI Deposit, and Property Income: ITAT Affirms Decisions on Additions and Disallowances.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80526</link>
    <description>Non-disclosure of income from maintenance charges was challenged. The assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting, and non-receipt of maintenance charges cannot be the basis for not crediting income. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, and the ITAT upheld the order, citing a lack of evidence suggesting the assessee received the maintenance charges. Late deposit of ESI funds was disallowed u/s 36(1)(va) based on the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in Checkmate Services P. Ltd, which held that employees&#039; contributions not paid within the due date are not allowable. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and restored the AO&#039;s order. Regarding the disallowance u/s 14A, the addition was restricted to the extent of exempt income, following the Del.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:26:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Income Disclosures, ESI Deposit, and Property Income: ITAT Affirms Decisions on Additions and Disallowances.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80526</link>
      <description>Non-disclosure of income from maintenance charges was challenged. The assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting, and non-receipt of maintenance charges cannot be the basis for not crediting income. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, and the ITAT upheld the order, citing a lack of evidence suggesting the assessee received the maintenance charges. Late deposit of ESI funds was disallowed u/s 36(1)(va) based on the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in Checkmate Services P. Ltd, which held that employees&#039; contributions not paid within the due date are not allowable. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and restored the AO&#039;s order. Regarding the disallowance u/s 14A, the addition was restricted to the extent of exempt income, following the Del.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:26:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>