Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The assessee, an employee who resigned voluntarily from Pfizer Healthcare India Pvt. Ltd., Aurangabad, received compensation which was accepted as capital in nature by the Assessing Officers after reopening assessments. The Revenue did not challenge this treatment nor initiate any section 263 proceedings, allowing it to attain finality. Relying on the ITAT Delhi ruling in ITO vs. Avirook Sen, where ex-gratia compensation paid voluntarily without employer obligation under service rules was held not to constitute section 17(3) income, the ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal. It held that the ex-gratia compensation received by the assessee was voluntary without employer obligation under service rules, and thus not taxable u/s 17(3). Consequently, the CIT(A)/NFAC order was set aside, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition.
The assessee, an employee who resigned voluntarily from Pfizer Healthcare India Pvt. Ltd., Aurangabad, received compensation which was accepted as capital in nature by the Assessing Officers after reopening assessments. The Revenue did not challenge this treatment nor initiate any section 263 proceedings, allowing it to attain finality. Relying on the ITAT Delhi ruling in ITO vs. Avirook Sen, where ex-gratia compensation paid voluntarily without employer obligation under service rules was held not to constitute section 17(3) income, the ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal. It held that the ex-gratia compensation received by the assessee was voluntary without employer obligation under service rules, and thus not taxable u/s 17(3). Consequently, the CIT(A)/NFAC order was set aside, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.