Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The assessee, an employee who resigned voluntarily from Pfizer Healthcare India Pvt. Ltd., Aurangabad, received compensation which was accepted as capital in nature by the Assessing Officers after reopening assessments. The Revenue did not challenge this treatment nor initiate any section 263 proceedings, allowing it to attain finality. Relying on the ITAT Delhi ruling in ITO vs. Avirook Sen, where ex-gratia compensation paid voluntarily without employer obligation under service rules was held not to constitute section 17(3) income, the ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal. It held that the ex-gratia compensation received by the assessee was voluntary without employer obligation under service rules, and thus not taxable u/s 17(3). Consequently, the CIT(A)/NFAC order was set aside, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition.
The assessee, an employee who resigned voluntarily from Pfizer Healthcare India Pvt. Ltd., Aurangabad, received compensation which was accepted as capital in nature by the Assessing Officers after reopening assessments. The Revenue did not challenge this treatment nor initiate any section 263 proceedings, allowing it to attain finality. Relying on the ITAT Delhi ruling in ITO vs. Avirook Sen, where ex-gratia compensation paid voluntarily without employer obligation under service rules was held not to constitute section 17(3) income, the ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal. It held that the ex-gratia compensation received by the assessee was voluntary without employer obligation under service rules, and thus not taxable u/s 17(3). Consequently, the CIT(A)/NFAC order was set aside, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.