Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
CENVAT Credit - Removal of capital goods - Depreciation - Deduction of 2.5% to be applied from the date of availing credit, not from the date of receiving or putting to use the capital goods - Rule 3(5) and Rule 3(5A) and Rule 4(2) of CCR - Though capital goods received at the same time, Rule 4(2) restricts availment of credit to 50% of duty paid on capital goods in a financial year - Legislature conscious of Rule 4(2) while introducing Rule 3(5A) - Ordinary meaning of "from the date of availing the credit" to be followed - No ambiguity to be read into - Appellant's calculation applying deductions on 100% from date of availing initial credit incorrect - Time limitation - No wilful suppression of facts established - Appellant paid amount as per their calculation and filed ST3 returns reflecting reversal of credit - Show cause notice time-barred - Appeal allowed on ground of limitation.
CENVAT Credit - Removal of capital goods - Depreciation - Deduction of 2.5% to be applied from the date of availing credit, not from the date of receiving or putting to use the capital goods - Rule 3(5) and Rule 3(5A) and Rule 4(2) of CCR - Though capital goods received at the same time, Rule 4(2) restricts availment of credit to 50% of duty paid on capital goods in a financial year - Legislature conscious of Rule 4(2) while introducing Rule 3(5A) - Ordinary meaning of "from the date of availing the credit" to be followed - No ambiguity to be read into - Appellant's calculation applying deductions on 100% from date of availing initial credit incorrect - Time limitation - No wilful suppression of facts established - Appellant paid amount as per their calculation and filed ST3 returns reflecting reversal of credit - Show cause notice time-barred - Appeal allowed on ground of limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
